bugtraq - Re: Circumventing quarantine control in Windows 2003 and ISA 2004

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:01:11 +0400
From: 3APA3A <3APA3A@...URITY.NNOV.RU>
To: "Memet Anwar" <mmta.gm@...il.com>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Circumventing quarantine control in Windows 2003 and ISA 2004

Dear Memet Anwar,

MA>  The problem is due to how the requirements are
MA> validated, it is trivial for users to trick RRAS/ISA into believing that the
MA> client's system are always aligned with the requirements, regardless the
MA> actual condition.

If  you  have local administrator level access to the box you can bypass
any  "internal" checks for this box. You can bypass any Domain policies.
You can do everything.

Quarantine  Control  was  not designed to protect against attack of this
kind. It's a tool to check policy matching, not to protect

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/isa/2004/plan/vpnroamingquarantine.mspx

-=-=-=-=- Quote begin -=-=-=-=-

Although Quarantine Control does not protect against attackers,
computer  configurations  for  authorized  users can be verified and, if
necessary, corrected before they can access the network.

-=-=-=-=-= Quote end =-=-=-=-=-

-- 
~/ZARAZA
http://www.security.nnov.ru/