bugtraq - Re: Re: "Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft" (is it a fair comparison?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.61.0611260834190.13896@malasada.lava.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:37:28 -1000 (HST)
From: Tim Newsham <newsham@...a.net>
To: Steve Friedl <steve@...xwiz.net>
Cc: stopmakingnoise@...il.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re: "Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft" (is it a fair
 comparison?)

> David Litchfield is such a respected authority in this field that many
> of us consider "Because David said so" to be the same as fact, and his
> mere opinion, offered to the list for free, is a gift to the security
> community.

Question everything, especially when it comes from an expert.  The facts 
can stand up for themselves.  Lets engage in science, not religeon.

(No disrespect intended to Litchfield).

> Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant |  UNIX Wizard  |   +1 714 544-6561

Tim Newsham
http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/