bugtraq - Re: [Full-disclosure] ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFAC047604.149B3EAF-ON88257237.0001C008-88257237.000288C1@3com.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:27:41 -0800
From: zdi-disclosures@...m.com
To: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	zdi-disclosures@...m.com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider
 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Thanks for pointing this out JP, it does in fact look confusing. We 
determined during the Digital Vaccine filter creation process that a 
previously released filter was robust enough to block the attack without 
further modification and the vendor was immeditately notified.

ZDI Team




"Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com> 
11/30/2006 05:02 AM

To
zdi-disclosures/F/US/3Com@...m
cc
full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject
Re: [Full-disclosure] ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider 
Buffer Overflow Vulnerability






On 11/29/06, zdi-disclosures@...m.com <zdi-disclosures@...m.com> wrote:
> ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider Buffer Overflow
>             Vulnerability
> http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-043.html
> November 29, 2006
 <snip>
> -- Disclosure Timeline:
> 2005.07.07 - Digital Vaccine released to TippingPoint customers
> 2006.10.02 - Vulnerability reported to vendor
> 2006.11.29 - Coordinated public release of advisory

you waited over a year to report it to the vendor?

sounds like analyzing your digital vaccine rules might yield a slew of
reproducible 0 days that vendors are unaware of.....

-JP<who is admittedly unaware of the tippingpoint vaccine format, and
about how much info can be gleaned from it>