bugtraq - Re: [Full-disclosure] ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e024ccca0611301752l6612db39u14ebd2836c671f4f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:52:25 -0500
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: "zdi-disclosures@...m.com" <zdi-disclosures@...m.com>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

On 11/30/06, zdi-disclosures@...m.com <zdi-disclosures@...m.com> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out JP, it does in fact look confusing. We
> determined during the Digital Vaccine filter creation process that a
> previously released filter was robust enough to block the attack without
> further modification and the vendor was immeditately notified.


NP,

I would clarify that in future notifications. i.e.: "tippingpoint
customers have been
protected from attacks of this kind since xyz date by GenericFilterX". Then
you could list the time lines for discovered/acquired, vendor
notification, patch released from vendor, and finally; public
disclosure.

-JP