bugtraq - Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702160526190.14891@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:27:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: jf <jf@...glingpointers.net>
To: thefinn12345@...il.com
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?

> There have also been too many times in the past when they have been proven correct to ignore the possibility any longer.

Hi, in what instances has the conjecture that a bug was a deliberate
backdoor been proven correct?