bugtraq - Re: LFI On SMF 1.1.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070718005153.30067.qmail@securityfocus.com>
Date: 18 Jul 2007 00:51:53 -0000
From: jkloske@...e.uq.edu.au
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: LFI On SMF 1.1.3

Let me preface this by saying I'm not a security expert, however considering that the above line is immediately preceeded by:

if (!isset($_REQUEST['action']) || !isset($actionArray[$_REQUEST['action']]))

...with a default action defined by either the theme or the the SMF software itself (causing the LFI statement to never be reached), and that $actionArray is statically defined beforehand; is this really an LFI vulnerability, or just something that looks like the LFI pattern on the surface?