bugtraq - Re: LFI On SMF 1.1.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <469E6418.2020006@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:03:52 +0000
From: Cornelius Riemenschneider <c.r1@....de>
To: jkloske@...e.uq.edu.au
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, sirn0n@...oo.com
Subject: Re: LFI On SMF 1.1.3

jkloske@...e.uq.edu.au schrieb:
> Let me preface this by saying I'm not a security expert, however
considering that the above line is immediately preceeded by:
>
> if (!isset($_REQUEST['action']) ||
!isset($actionArray[$_REQUEST['action']]))
>
> ...with a default action defined by either the theme or the the SMF
software itself (causing the LFI statement to never be reached), and
that $actionArray is statically defined beforehand; is this really an
LFI vulnerability, or just something that looks like the LFI pattern on
the surface?
>
It's NOT a security Vulnerability, false report, and @sirn0n, please
stop spamming, thx :)
Cornelius Riemenschneider
-- 

My source of power: www.humppa.com