bugtraq - Re: We're now paying up to $20,000 for web vulns in our services

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:13:01 -0700
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
To: Jim Harrison <Jim@...tools.org>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
  dailydave <dailydave@...ts.immunityinc.com>,
  bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
  "websecurity@...ts.webappsec.org" <websecurity@...ts.webappsec.org>
Subject: Re: We're now paying up to $20,000 for web vulns in our services

> IMHO, anyone who willingly, knowingly places customer data at risk by inviting attacks on their production systems is playing a very dangerous game. There is no guarantee that a vuln discovered by a truly honest researcher couldn't become a weapon for the dishonest "researcher" through secondary discovery

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying that the dishonest researcher
will not try to find vulnerabilities if there is no reward program for
the honest ones?

/mz