full-disclosure - (no subject)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <003801c24554$9babeb60$e62d1c41@kc.rr.com>
From: mattmurphy at kc.rr.com (Matthew Murphy)
Subject: (no subject)

>In some ways, I understand their ire.  There are, within the "security
>industry" (whatever that means) people who-- intentionally or
>unintentionally-- sell their customers short
[major snip]
>providing little of use to anyone, including their customers.  But
>they're not everyone.

So vendors are giving people a false sense of security -- but, isn't the
purpose of this list (at least in part) to expose such things (by presenting
timely information, etc.)?  In that case, what purpose would attacking
the list serve?