lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <003801c24554$9babeb60$e62d1c41@kc.rr.com> From: mattmurphy at kc.rr.com (Matthew Murphy) Subject: (no subject) >In some ways, I understand their ire. There are, within the "security >industry" (whatever that means) people who-- intentionally or >unintentionally-- sell their customers short [major snip] >providing little of use to anyone, including their customers. But >they're not everyone. So vendors are giving people a false sense of security -- but, isn't the purpose of this list (at least in part) to expose such things (by presenting timely information, etc.)? In that case, what purpose would attacking the list serve?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists