full-disclosure - (no subject)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7DE6DED8-B14D-11D6-90F3-000393779ABA@sackheads.org>
From: cerebus at sackheads.org (Timothy J.Miller)
Subject: (no subject)

On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 01:42 PM, Matthew Murphy wrote:

>> So vendors are giving people a false sense of security -- but, isn't 
>> the
> purpose of this list (at least in part) to expose such things (by 
> presenting
> timely information, etc.)?  In that case, what purpose would attacking
> the list serve?

I never said I condoned their activity, just that I understand their 
motivations and in some limited way sympathize with them.  In their own 
view (or, more accurately, in their view as it seems to *me*), attacking 
the list disrupts the flow of information from the legitimate community 
into the hands of what they see as an illegitimate community-- the 
semi-skilled security "experts."

-- Cerebus