full-disclosure - hypo-crazy ;)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20020824094802.28152.qmail@email.com>
From: sockz at email.com (sockz loves you)
Subject: hypo-crazy ;)

----- Original Message -----
From: aliver@...il.com
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:18:59 -0700 
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;)

> > No Sockz, not a 'petty attack'.
> 
> I don't really know Sockz, but it's a little aggravating to see you post
> this to the list. My memory isn't _that_ short. Let's quote your reply to
> him:
> 
> " Perhaps if you spent more time actually working on your course and not
> hanging in #phrack you'd have known that. "
> 
> This is _clearly_ a personal attack, and also quite accurately described
> as "petty". Don't insult the intelligence of the list members by
> suggesting otherwise.

thanks aliver, but i can hold my own.  i wasn't _really_ that insulted by the
comment.  just surprised i spose.  i'm laffing about it at the moment cuz i'm
currently banned from #phrack for reasons beyond my ability to change.  if my
original response seemed a bit catty then i appologise.  btw just to clarify,
i dont claim to be on the PHC.  i dont see myself ever being on the PHC.  but
that said, i do support their efforts.

> > I'm quite willing to go into my reasons off list,
>
> Yes, but you were willing to send this content-free message to the list
> denying that you did anything.
>
> This sounds more like an excuse to me, but since it's unclear exactly what
> your talking about I can't say for sure.

meh.  i guess what's being referred to here is the content of those posts after
this one?  i thought your story was pretty interesting, though i found myself
unable to reply in depth without bringing forth examples from my own
experiences, the kind which i am not willing to go into over a public list.
i'm guessing this problem is what john/immn was also referring to.  which is
completely understandable.  suffice to say, i dont envision myself working for
the DoD :)  that privilege was pretty much revoked before i even decided to
persue a career in politics/whatever.  it doesn't bother me in the slightest.
i cant think of anything more boring than sitting behind a desk all day,
advocating a cause i dont even believe in, just to earn a nice wage.  money has
never been as important as my beliefs, and i dont intend on changing those
priorities any time soon.

realistically who would want to be helping the DoD in its current state at the
moment anyway.  i mean in terms of policy decisions, its completely f*cked up!
-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup