full-disclosure - hypo-crazy ;)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000701c24b75$2f95d2c0$b0b354d2@wsp01>
From: fred at the-debaters.com (M L Lynch [ SotG ])
Subject: hypo-crazy ;)

It is not, not being able to work for the DoD you should be worried about.

----- Original Message -----
From: "sockz loves you" <sockz@...il.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;)


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: aliver@...il.com
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:18:59 -0700
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;)
>
> > > No Sockz, not a 'petty attack'.
> >
> > I don't really know Sockz, but it's a little aggravating to see you post
> > this to the list. My memory isn't _that_ short. Let's quote your reply
to
> > him:
> >
> > " Perhaps if you spent more time actually working on your course and not
> > hanging in #phrack you'd have known that. "
> >
> > This is _clearly_ a personal attack, and also quite accurately described
> > as "petty". Don't insult the intelligence of the list members by
> > suggesting otherwise.
>
> thanks aliver, but i can hold my own.  i wasn't _really_ that insulted by
the
> comment.  just surprised i spose.  i'm laffing about it at the moment cuz
i'm
> currently banned from #phrack for reasons beyond my ability to change.  if
my
> original response seemed a bit catty then i appologise.  btw just to
clarify,
> i dont claim to be on the PHC.  i dont see myself ever being on the PHC.
but
> that said, i do support their efforts.
>
> > > I'm quite willing to go into my reasons off list,
> >
> > Yes, but you were willing to send this content-free message to the list
> > denying that you did anything.
> >
> > This sounds more like an excuse to me, but since it's unclear exactly
what
> > your talking about I can't say for sure.
>
> meh.  i guess what's being referred to here is the content of those posts
after
> this one?  i thought your story was pretty interesting, though i found
myself
> unable to reply in depth without bringing forth examples from my own
> experiences, the kind which i am not willing to go into over a public
list.
> i'm guessing this problem is what john/immn was also referring to.  which
is
> completely understandable.  suffice to say, i dont envision myself working
for
> the DoD :)  that privilege was pretty much revoked before i even decided
to
> persue a career in politics/whatever.  it doesn't bother me in the
slightest.
> i cant think of anything more boring than sitting behind a desk all day,
> advocating a cause i dont even believe in, just to earn a nice wage.
money has
> never been as important as my beliefs, and i dont intend on changing those
> priorities any time soon.
>
> realistically who would want to be helping the DoD in its current state at
the
> moment anyway.  i mean in terms of policy decisions, its completely f*cked
up!
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
> http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>