lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000701c24b75$2f95d2c0$b0b354d2@wsp01> From: fred at the-debaters.com (M L Lynch [ SotG ]) Subject: hypo-crazy ;) It is not, not being able to work for the DoD you should be worried about. ----- Original Message ----- From: "sockz loves you" <sockz@...il.com> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com> Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: aliver@...il.com > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:18:59 -0700 > To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;) > > > > No Sockz, not a 'petty attack'. > > > > I don't really know Sockz, but it's a little aggravating to see you post > > this to the list. My memory isn't _that_ short. Let's quote your reply to > > him: > > > > " Perhaps if you spent more time actually working on your course and not > > hanging in #phrack you'd have known that. " > > > > This is _clearly_ a personal attack, and also quite accurately described > > as "petty". Don't insult the intelligence of the list members by > > suggesting otherwise. > > thanks aliver, but i can hold my own. i wasn't _really_ that insulted by the > comment. just surprised i spose. i'm laffing about it at the moment cuz i'm > currently banned from #phrack for reasons beyond my ability to change. if my > original response seemed a bit catty then i appologise. btw just to clarify, > i dont claim to be on the PHC. i dont see myself ever being on the PHC. but > that said, i do support their efforts. > > > > I'm quite willing to go into my reasons off list, > > > > Yes, but you were willing to send this content-free message to the list > > denying that you did anything. > > > > This sounds more like an excuse to me, but since it's unclear exactly what > > your talking about I can't say for sure. > > meh. i guess what's being referred to here is the content of those posts after > this one? i thought your story was pretty interesting, though i found myself > unable to reply in depth without bringing forth examples from my own > experiences, the kind which i am not willing to go into over a public list. > i'm guessing this problem is what john/immn was also referring to. which is > completely understandable. suffice to say, i dont envision myself working for > the DoD :) that privilege was pretty much revoked before i even decided to > persue a career in politics/whatever. it doesn't bother me in the slightest. > i cant think of anything more boring than sitting behind a desk all day, > advocating a cause i dont even believe in, just to earn a nice wage. money has > never been as important as my beliefs, and i dont intend on changing those > priorities any time soon. > > realistically who would want to be helping the DoD in its current state at the > moment anyway. i mean in terms of policy decisions, its completely f*cked up! > -- > __________________________________________________________ > Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com > http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists