lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <NMRC.666.6.66.0208251710590.23036-100000@www.nmrc.org> From: hellnbak at nmrc.org (hellNbak) Subject: David Ahmad (securityfocus/symantec) exposed If it is truly well known, then how about some actual proof. That is all I am asking. I mean, especially on this list, how can anyone trust what comes from an anonymous email account with no evidence. On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 rfp_the_ripper@...hmail.com wrote: > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 13:22:14 -0700 > From: rfp_the_ripper@...hmail.com > Reply-To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] David Ahmad (securityfocus/symantec) > exposed > > > It's a pretty well known fact, inasmuch as Elias Levy of > securityfocus = aleph1 (= r00t, which was also a criminal > group) and Michael Schiffman of @stake = route (= r00t, > guild -- both criminal groups that any scene savvy person > knows committed felonies back in the day). > > > > >Is there any real proof of this or is it nothing but a bunch of > > > >misinformation directed at the big bad evil corporation? > > > >Seriously, where is the proof? > > > > > >On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Defender Defender wrote: > > > >> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 16:23:58 +0000 > >> From: Defender Defender <defender242@...mail.com> > >> Reply-To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > >> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > >> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] David Ahmad (securityfocus/sym > >antec) > >> exposed > >> > >> > > >> >I was part of several hacker and cracker groups before enter > >ing the > >> >white-hat side. So what? > >> > > >> > >> So it depends much on what you do. You could have the belief > >that some > >> people are worth being hacked, and some others secure, of cou > >rse. > >> > >> But if you were moderator of bugtraq, a "full-disclosure" mai > >ling list, it > >> would obviously just be another proof that all you want is mo > >re hacked > >> boxes, and more work and $$$. > >> > >> That would be a total lack of integrity. > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________ > >____ > >> Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > >> http://www.hotmail.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > >> > > > >-- > >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" > > > >hellNbak@...c.org > >http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak > > > >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > > > > Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" hellNbak@...c.org http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists