[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20020826055346.GB10982@home.parts-unknown.org>
From: benfell at greybeard95a.com (David Benfell)
Subject: David Ahmad (securityfocus/symantec) exposed
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:04:34 -0700, rfp_the_ripper@...hmail.com wrote:
>
> Tell me how one would go about proving this. I guess the only
> way you can be certain of the statement's validity is if
> David himself confirms or denies it. One also faces the same
> problem offering "proof" concerning Chris Klaus' malicious
> activities in #hack back in the day. But here I go throwing
> around "propaganda" again...
>
Okay. That's nice. But this is not Security Focus. Nor is it
Symantec. Is your unproven allegation supposed to somehow rationalize
the attack on this list? Is it supposed to somehow rationalize
continued black hat activities? Or is simply a smear tactic?
More questions strike me. You accuse David and Chris of malicious
activity. You are "outing" them, as it were. And yet, black hats are
supposed to oppose the concept of full disclosure, fearing it might
devalue their attempts at extortion.
It's one thing to change sides; you, however, are simply a hypocrite.
Or, perhaps, David and Chris have failed to pay your demands. Either
way, there is one place where you belong -- on my black list.
--
David Benfell, LCP
benfell@...ts-unknown.org
---
Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20020825/ad3c0a10/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists