full-disclosure - Just a suggestion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BEF83059BBECD511B9270008C7490A590A4FA9@skunk.ddpwa.com>
From: csnow at deltadentalwa.com (Snow, Corey)
Subject: Just a suggestion

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Manzuik [mailto:steve@...renchtech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:48 AM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Just a suggestion
> 
> 
> As someone who moderates a mailing list or two, I am curious. 
>  What is the issue with moderation?  Why does a model where 
> there are multiple moderators not work compared to this model?
>  
> Please, no flames, I am seriously curious.

I think there are many reasons, but chief among them is that moderators will
always apply their personal bias to what is or is not allowed through-
that's the nature of moderation. Even the most objective, fair-minded person
will disallow a post that someone else would have allowed. On any other list
dedicated to security, the somewhat silly, but still very informative,
recent back-and-forth between Aliver and others (The "Trash-Talker
Challenge") would never have seen the light of day.

A model with multiple moderators can be even worse- what one mod lets
through, another shitcans. It's happened on other lists. Uniformity of
enforcement is difficult (impossible?) to achieve on any moderation policy
that is content-based.

It's also an issue of perception- people tend to trust a forum dedicated to
"full disclosure" if they know they can post to it at will and have their
voice heard.

I have to admit, the S/N ratio has gone up a massive amount since this list
started, for which I'm grateful. I'm guessing it was mostly because of the
change to "only subscribers may post", but who knows.

Corey M. Snow- csnow@...tadentalwa.com
I don't speak for my employer.
> 

#########################################################
The information contained in this e-mail and subsequent attachments may be privileged, 
confidential and protected from disclosure.  This transmission is intended for the sole 
use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.  If you 
think that you have received this message in error, please e-mail the sender at the above 
e-mail address.
#########################################################