full-disclosure - Just a suggestion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: hellnbak at nmrc.org (hellNbak)
Subject: Just a suggestion

I think you misunderstood the question.  full-disclosure is *NOT*
moderated.  I am wondering why people prefer this over the model that
VulnWatch uses.

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Ka wrote:

> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:31:49 +0200
> From: Ka <ka@...dr.net>
> Reply-To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Just a suggestion
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> At Mittwoch, 28. August 2002 17:47 Steve Manzuik wrote:
> > As someone who moderates a mailing list or two, I am curious.  What is the
> > issue with moderation?  Why does a model where there are multiple
> > moderators not work compared to this model?
>
> AFAIK the list is unmoderated (please correct me, if I'm wrong).
>
> Ka
> - --
> http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE9bPr172vu22ltWBERAtU0AJ48nUOHLHcyf6642lky9RGL35hpWwCfa/Ax
> 3NCwvyfnhE7FMKl+XjfzA0o=
> =PgO6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"

hellNbak@...c.org
http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-