[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <NMRC.666.6.66.0208281237550.3765-100000@www.nmrc.org>
From: hellnbak at nmrc.org (hellNbak)
Subject: Just a suggestion
I think you misunderstood the question. full-disclosure is *NOT*
moderated. I am wondering why people prefer this over the model that
VulnWatch uses.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Ka wrote:
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:31:49 +0200
> From: Ka <ka@...dr.net>
> Reply-To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Just a suggestion
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> At Mittwoch, 28. August 2002 17:47 Steve Manzuik wrote:
> > As someone who moderates a mailing list or two, I am curious. What is the
> > issue with moderation? Why does a model where there are multiple
> > moderators not work compared to this model?
>
> AFAIK the list is unmoderated (please correct me, if I'm wrong).
>
> Ka
> - --
> http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE9bPr172vu22ltWBERAtU0AJ48nUOHLHcyf6642lky9RGL35hpWwCfa/Ax
> 3NCwvyfnhE7FMKl+XjfzA0o=
> =PgO6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"
hellNbak@...c.org
http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists