lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20020828184813.L14345@cleannorth.org> From: odin at svartalfheim.net (Dan Brosemer) Subject: Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:17:21PM +0100, John Cartwright wrote: > After seeing much debate on the subject, we've decided to resolve this > issue in a democratic manner. Please vote at the below URL for your > reply-to preference: should it be to the poster, or the list, by > default. > > http://www.netalarms.com/story/2002/8/28/1462/54551 > > We'll make changes (if necessary) once the closing date has been reached > (the 31st of this month). How about leaving it as the poster specifies? It took me long enough to remove the "[Full-Disclosure]" BS from the subject lines. I'd rather not have to find a way to un-mangle the Reply-To: header as well. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -Dan -- "Burnished gallows set with red Caress the fevered, empty mind Of man who hangs bloodied and blind To reach for wisdom, not for bread." -- Deoridhe Grimsdaughter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists