full-disclosure - Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3D6D5D75.6090100@snosoft.com>
From: dotslash at snosoft.com (KF)
Subject: Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences

Anyone wanna take bets... this could be like a horse race hehe.

http://www.netalarms.com/poll/1030557676_QUuGWtuE
-KF


Dan Brosemer wrote:

>On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:17:21PM +0100, John Cartwright wrote:
>
>>After seeing much debate on the subject, we've decided to resolve this
>>issue in a democratic manner. Please vote at the below URL for your 
>>reply-to preference: should it be to the poster, or the list, by 
>>default.
>>
>>http://www.netalarms.com/story/2002/8/28/1462/54551
>>
>>We'll make changes (if necessary) once the closing date has been reached
>>(the 31st of this month).
>>
>
>How about leaving it as the poster specifies?  It took me long enough to
>remove the "[Full-Disclosure]" BS from the subject lines.  I'd rather not
>have to find a way to un-mangle the Reply-To: header as well.
>
>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
>-Dan
>