full-disclosure - Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20020829105914.GA22328@www1.grok.org.uk>
From: johnc at grok.org.uk (John Cartwright)
Subject: Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:48:14PM -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:

> How about leaving it as the poster specifies?  

FYI:

"When set to Poster, no Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although 
if one is present in the original message, it is not stripped."

Apologies for not clarifying this before the poll started.

Cheers
- John