[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <117f01c26158$0e3dc260$1e01320a@drizzt>
From: nexus at patrol.i-way.co.uk (Nexus)
Subject: MS Updates, Was : MS-02-052
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moyer, Shawn" <SMoyer@...re.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: MS-02-052
[snip]
> It is quite lame to make this only available via Windows Update. A lot of
> people are deploying their own internal patch management methods and
> blocking Windows Update / disabling the new AutoUpdate stuff so that
patches
> can be tested and verified first rather than letting the end-user make the
> call. Not making the patches available any other way makes that kinda
tough
> to do. Hopefully we'll see the same patch in another form later on.
[snip]
By "only" I assume that you are also referring to
http://corporate.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/ that allows you to download
service packs and hotfixes in their entirety for testing and subsequent push
deployment from your patchbox ?
OK you do need to accept the javascript and the ActiveX controls and it can
be a bit fiddly; you will probably get the warnings as well - AFAIR they
sign the cab file but not all the files it contains. Or you could script
up some wgets and pull the updates from ftp.microsoft.com ? You can
probably also get them on CD from MSDN as well.
But you are correct that you can only get them from one place, and it's
Microsoft ;-)
Cheers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists