full-disclosure - 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0210110616030.17965-100000@tundra.winternet.com>
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee!

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Damian Gerow wrote:

> Spake David Vincent on 10/10/2002, 13:41:25 -0700:
> > i'm a patient person, but surely the 25+ copies of this spam being sent to
> > the list is enough to get this address banned/bumped for at least a few
> > days?
> >
> > spam sucks.
>
> It's not actually gobbles sending out the message.  Check the validity
> of the signature at hushtools.com.
>
> As discussed to death in the past couple of weeks, if you don't like
> the messages, see procmail(1) and procmailrc(5).

of course this technique is limited, or costly, as it gets rid of the
offending address<s> or subject's, and yet, requires all those responding
to these lame spams to be blackholed too.  Like the one responded to here.
Procmail, while a decent tool does not eliminate the issue in total, that
requires the list maintainers to take action.  Even an unmoderated list
requires some filtering of abusers.  Otherwise, what good is a list
charter?

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
	***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.