[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00f701c2b99d$274b8560$08e582d0@ethics01>
From: nick at ethicsdesign.com (Nick Jacobsen)
Subject: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq
Now, the question is, HAS anyone mirrored it? would be nice if someone had,
and was willing to share...
Nick J,
Ethics Design
nick@...icsdesign.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Dyke" <ken_i_m@...gantinnovations.net>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 06:21, Brian McWilliams wrote:
> > Like folks said earlier, the "Exploit" tab is missing, but that doesn't
> > mean the exploit is gone. You just have to dig, starting with the stuff
in
> > the "Credit" tab, to find the SF mailing list message that spawned the
BID
> > in the first place.
>
> It could also be argued that this is the first step in making that
> information disappear. Keep moving it to raise the doubt that it has
> not disappeared but one is simply not "digging" deep enough to find it.
>
> It also raises the level of friction for workers who have relied on that
> info being there. Greatly increasing the time required for a task that
> involves referencing that info in some way.
>
> Of course, if this info is core to what someone does they are an idiot
> for not mirroring the data in some fashion. Never rely on another party
> for a core dependency. To me, this is the number one reason against
> proprietary operating systems and applications.
>
> --
> I think, therefore, ken_i_m
> Chief Gadgeteer,
> Elegant Innovations
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists