[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200301111839.09087.ka@khidr.net>
From: ka at khidr.net (Ka)
Subject: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 17:15 Ken Dyke wrote:
> "Historic facts" indicates a lack of understanding of history.
> </pedantic>
Yes. </conceding>
> Without a mult-point view of history the decision of what to do "NOW"
> will, to a very high order, be wrong.
And with a multi-point view of history this is not
different. Just the opposite, because the illusion
to have a multipoint view (about the present and not
about the past) will create the false assumption
"to be in the know". Consequently erroneous assumptions
and conclusions will be overlooked, more probably.
> I think, therefore, ken_i_m
Nope. Therefore you think that you are the thinker
(or Ken or whatever).
If you love to be pedantic in your thinking, go the whole
way. Otherwise the points where you stop to be pedantic
are an indication of your unchallenged illusions, of your
unverified copies from historic scriptures.
You certainly wouldn't execute a script on your workstation
without having analyzed it first. With your brain you seem
to be less aware. Why else would you copy and reproduce
variants of old, wrotten bullshit (aah, say: historic scripts)
like "I think, therefore I am" ?
Ka
- --
http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE+IFaC72vu22ltWBERAhjIAJ9MjkByVHcnqL8mO/rfo6422kT5tACfUpHE
iQZjMr9VQkIsDsUxeE4fBS4=
=VUdu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists