[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1043868648.4463.152.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: recon at snosoft.com (Strategic Reconnaissance Team)
Subject: [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full
Disclosure != Exploit Release
Actually,
Not to contradict you, but no we won't. We are considering creating
signatures for both. Our goal is to help the security industry, not to
damage it.
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:50, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Strategic Reconnaissance Team <recon@...soft.com> writes:
>
> > It is possible to prove a vulnerability exists by releasing well written
> > advisories. Because of this fact, proof of concept code (exploit
> > source) is not a requirement for the education of the possibly
> > vulnerable.
>
> If you don't publish such code, you will eventuall kill projects like
> Nessus and Snort by starvation. Is this your intention?
--
Strategic Reconnaissance Team <recon@...soft.com>
Secure Network Operations, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030129/b0f6ec0c/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists