full-disclosure - [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] FullDisclosure != Exploit Release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1043874912.4463.210.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: recon at snosoft.com (Strategic Reconnaissance Team)
Subject: [Secure Network Operations, Inc.]
	FullDisclosure != Exploit Release

On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:10, Geo wrote:
SNIP

> We obviously can't trust the vendors, and with the range of
> different configurations of machines I'm not even sure that's a reasonable
> requirement of a vendor to test every possible combination.
SNIP

	This is what we are trying to fix.  Vendors are simply too swamped
(this is what they seem to say at least) to be able to fix everything as
fast as people would like. This is one thing that Secure Network
Operations wants to help vendors resolve. We want to help vendors earn
the trust of network and security professionals. At the moment, security
validation is just not a part of the every day development procedure, I
personally think it should be.



-- 
Strategic Reconnaissance Team <recon@...soft.com>
Secure Network Operations, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030129/96c69c58/attachment.bin