full-disclosure - Origin of the term "driveby download"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: rms at computerbytesman.com (Richard M. Smith)
Subject: Origin of the term "driveby download"

Hi Thor,

Actually the term "drive-by download" is a marketing term invented by
Alexa Internet according to this old posting on Fucked Company:

   downloads - you click you get it 1/31/2001 01:58 PM EST

   no, there was a time (and how they got the majority 
   of their users) that it was a driveby download, meaning 
   you click on the banner you got it!  it was only towards 
   the end that the proceedure was changed because of
   all the complaints. the big guys debated back and forth 
   (when they were speaking) about the instant download 
   process vs. permission based. 

Yes, there is ActiveX warning message for a driveby download, but I
think it is classic "blaming the victim" to call users who click the yes
button as "stupid".  Most computer users today just see a computer as a
tool and they are not programmers.  Vendors like Xupiter and Gator are
working the percentages by relying on users to not read the warning
boxes carefully enough and hope they hit "Yes" button to make the boxes
go away as quick as possible. 

If an ActiveX control auto-installs without a security warning, then
most likely security settings must be messed up.

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Thor Larholm [mailto:lists.netsys.com@...ript.dk] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:53 AM
To: Richard M. Smith; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar

From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms@...puterbytesman.com>
> Has anyone looked into this new Xupiter toolbar to see how it is being
> installed on people's computer?  In particular is it using some IE
> security hole for the install or does it just use the standard ActiveX
> drive-by download mechanism?

It is a standard signed ActiveX component, you have to EXPLICITLY accept
installation. It is not using any security holes for installation, and
it
will only auto-install if you have set your security settings to the
absolute MINIMUM. The only culprit here is user stupidity.

There is no such thing as a "standard ActiveX drive-by download
mechanism",
that term is utterly FUD.

Regards
Thor Larholm