full-disclosure - RE: [tFull-Disclosure] SQL Server patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1044023907.803.5.camel@bobby>
From: nicob at nicob.net (Nicob)
Subject: RE: [tFull-Disclosure] SQL Server patch - why doesn't Windows
 update help?

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 12:27, John.Airey@...b.org.uk wrote:

> Compare this to Red Hat Network. You can see at a glance whether your
> registered servers are up to date (from anywhere with Internet Access).
> There are probably other Linux distros that do the same.

Red Hat is one of the worst distribution of Linux in terms of patches
and upgrades. You need to register (OK, it's free) to the Red Hat
Network, and dependencies are not handled very well.

On Debian, to know if you're up-to-date :

	apt-get update; apt-get upgrade -s

To install the lastest fixes :

	apt-get update; apt-get upgrade

And in Debian, the fixes are back-ported. No added functionnality in the
soft that you're upgrading, so (a lot) less bad surprises ...

Nicob