[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <JAEGIICLHAJHLINAEHLBKEHGCNAA.erc@pobox.com>
From: erc at pobox.com (Ed Carp)
Subject: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?
Overkill. Why not use squid, which is included with every Linux system?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of KF
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 5:12 AM
> To: Nick Jacobsen
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content
> Monitoring solution?
>
>
> Snort?
>
> http://www.snort.org/cgi-bin/sigs-search.cgi?sid=porn
>
> -KF
>
>
> Nick Jacobsen wrote:
>
> >Not sure that this is an exactly suitable topic, but anything
> seems to go,
> >so...
> >
> >I am trying to find an open source (read free) PASSIVE web content
> >monitoring solution. We are looking for something that can be put on a
> >network, and using promiscuous mode, capture and analyze web
> traffic, etc...
> >We would obviously place this in such a way that all network
> traffic would
> >pass by it. Any suggestions would be welcome, though again, I am looking
> >for something specifically designed to do this, as I know I could modify
> >existing tools myself...
> >
> >Nick
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists