full-disclosure - Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <004b01c2ff8f$136b98e0$20e5a53f@ethics01>
From: nick at ethicsdesign.com (Nick Jacobsen)
Subject: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?

Maybe I was not specific enough.  When I said "Web Content Monitoring" I was
refering to monitoring the web site usage by employees during business
hours.  I am not specifically looking for something that would trace it back
to the employee, just something to give my client a good overview of most
the surfing.  I have seen the commercial solutions, such as silentrunner,
and websweeper, but those are targeted more toward stoping the viewing of
web sites, not just monitoring, plus, of course, they cost :)  Also, as I
said in my origian post, I realize I could implement this myself, but again,
I would rather not re-invent the wheel.

Sorry if my original post was unclear

Nick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Carp" <erc@...ox.com>
To: "KF" <dotslash@...soft.com>; "Nick Jacobsen" <nick@...icsdesign.com>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content
Monitoring solution?


> Overkill.  Why not use squid, which is included with every Linux system?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of KF
> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 5:12 AM
> > To: Nick Jacobsen
> > Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content
> > Monitoring solution?
> >
> >
> > Snort?
> >
> > http://www.snort.org/cgi-bin/sigs-search.cgi?sid=porn
> >
> > -KF
> >
> >
> > Nick Jacobsen wrote:
> >
> > >Not sure that this is an exactly suitable topic, but anything
> > seems to go,
> > >so...
> > >
> > >I am trying to find an open source (read free) PASSIVE web content
> > >monitoring solution.  We are looking for something that can be put on a
> > >network, and using promiscuous mode, capture and analyze web
> > traffic, etc...
> > >We would obviously place this in such a way that all network
> > traffic would
> > >pass by it.  Any suggestions would be welcome, though again, I am
looking
> > >for something specifically designed to do this, as I know I could
modify
> > >existing tools myself...
> > >
> > >Nick
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
>