full-disclosure - RE: [ISN] DARPA pulls OpenBSD funding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Paul Schmehl)
Subject: RE: [ISN] DARPA pulls OpenBSD funding

Thank you.  I'm so sick and tired of hearing the cry of "McCarthyism" from 
celebrities who have spoken out against the war and are now suffering from 
boycotts of their products.  Get over it.  You had the right to say what 
you want.  And we have the right to not buy your stupid records, movies, 
whatever.

It's *free* speech, *not* speech without consequences.  Ask Senator Trent 
Lott if there is a price for speech.  I didn't hear any of the anti-war 
celebrities complain about that.

--On Friday, April 18, 2003 10:09:45 AM -1000 Jason Coombs 
<jasonc@...ence.org> wrote:

>> "In the U.S., today, free speech is just a myth," de Raadt said.
>
> This is an important issue because so many people get it completely
> wrong, de Raadt included.
>
> Free speech means the government cannot put you in jail for the things
> you say or believe.
>
> It does not mean the government is required to continue to pay you to do
> work or fund your projects regardless of the things that you say or
> believe.
>
> It does not mean the government cannot create hardship for you, or that it
> must protect you from hardship imposed on you by others.
>
> Further, the U.S. constitution does not apply to foreign nationals and it
> has no direct impact on business dealings except indirectly as it relates
> to the legislative process whereby State and Federal laws are enacted and
> enforced that seek to regulate business dealings consistent with
> constitutional law.
>
> We must bear in mind that free speech exists within a context of freedom;
> we cannot impose behavioral restrictions or affirmative obligations on
> government agencies or private parties that remove the freedom of those
> parties to exercise sound subjective judgment. The day that we impose
> government controls for allowable consequences against you for your
> choice to exercise your freedom of speech is the day we kill freedom in
> our effort to protect speech.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu