full-disclosure - RE: Rijndael

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3EA3DE96.7040200@algroup.co.uk>
From: ben at algroup.co.uk (Ben Laurie)
Subject: RE: Rijndael

Steve Poirot wrote:

>  There were some requirements concerning the algorithm's ability to run
> in confined environments, with regard to both memory and processing
> power.  I believe the ability or run on a smart card was one of the
> concerns.  Here's a link to a report on the selection process, including
> how the various algorithm's came out against the original evaluation
> criteria: http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/aes/round2/r2report.pdf

I cannot see how key scheduling speed is plausibly relevant to confined
environments, though. I'm sure you can cook up an example, but it'll be
very artificial, IMO.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff