lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D503BBD92FE9D2118A010008C75F64481BC03F88@usnssexc20.us.kworld.kpmg.com>
From: tjevans at bearingpoint.net (Evans, TJ (BearingPoint))
Subject: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign

At one time, i.e. - don't know if it still the case - Thawte would issue a
"personal cert" free.  

One advantage PGP has is the existing infrastructure for key distribution,
so that you do not necessarily need to have someone's public key (yet) in
order to encrypt to them or verify their signature.  If they have pushed it
out to the publicly accessible key-servers you can get it as needed.  But
again - it depends on what problem you are trying to solve and your
preferred method of doing so.


TJ
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Carasik [mailto:gator@...l.cacr.caltech.edu] 
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Kamal Habayeb
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PGP vs. certificate from Verisign

OpenPGP is free :) as are other implementations of PGP.

Paying VeriSign to create a digital certificate for you
is not worth it, considering most of the encryption you
run into in the wild is PGP keys.

-Anne


Kamal Habayeb grabbed a keyboard and typed...
> Greetings,
> 
> I'm trying to get some expert opinions on which is better.  Using Outlook
> 2002, would it be better to use PGP to encrypt messages or use the
built-in
> option with a digital certificate from Verisign (or some other CA)?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kamal



******************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally 
privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the 
intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended 
recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, 
distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken 
in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not 
the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this 
message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, 
and any copies thereof from your system.
******************************************************************************


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ