| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <028a01c3241f$07ba6cb0$0200a8c0@01010101a> From: nick at ethicsdesign.com (Nick Jacobsen) Subject: Fw: A question for the list... There is one thing sort of left out so far, I beleive... according to most jurisdictions, wether something is copyrighted or not, you still have the right to qoute from it, as long as you attribute it to the author. Ethics ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cedric Blancher" <blancher@...tel-securite.fr> To: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity@...mail.com> Cc: "Ed Carp" <erc@...ox.com>; "Full-Disclosure@...ts. Netsys. Com" <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 11:13 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list... > Le mar 27/05/2003 ? 01:34, morning_wood a ?crit : > > Mail is private until read, just because its labled as "mail" does not > > imply land based mail laws in whatever country you are in apply. > > In France, jurisprudence tends to treat email exactly as common mail in > terms of privacy. Thus, according to this, you should not forward > private email without explicit sender's authorization as an example. > > -- > C?dric Blancher <blancher@...tel-securite.fr> > IT systems and networks security - Cartel S?curit? > Phone : +33 (0)1 44 06 97 87 - Fax: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 99 > PGP KeyID:157E98EE FingerPrint:FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists