full-disclosure - Fw: A question for the list...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000701c32424$2082a000$0201a8c0@S2IB.local.com>
From: ulysse at madchat.org (Ulysse)
Subject: Fw: A question for the list...

I am not sure there's only the "copyright problem"...
I would'nt try, if I found a "top secret folder"  of the french secret
services to cut and paste it to some mailing list, even if I attribute
it to the author!

Ulysse

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
> Nick Jacobsen
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:10 AM
> To: Cedric Blancher; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list...
> 
> 
> There is one thing sort of left out so far, I beleive...  
> according to most
> jurisdictions, wether something is copyrighted or not, you 
> still have the
> right to qoute from it, as long as you attribute it to the author.
> 
> Ethics
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Cedric Blancher" <blancher@...tel-securite.fr>
> To: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity@...mail.com>
> Cc: "Ed Carp" <erc@...ox.com>; "Full-Disclosure@...ts. Netsys. Com"
> <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 11:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list...
> 
> 
> > Le mar 27/05/2003 ? 01:34, morning_wood a ?crit :
> > > Mail is private until read, just because its labled as 
> "mail" does not
> > > imply land based mail laws in whatever country you are in apply.
> >
> > In France, jurisprudence tends to treat email exactly as 
> common mail in
> > terms of privacy. Thus, according to this, you should not forward
> > private email without explicit sender's authorization as an example.
> >
> > -- 
> > C?dric Blancher  <blancher@...tel-securite.fr>
> > IT systems and networks security - Cartel S?curit?
> > Phone : +33 (0)1 44 06 97 87 - Fax: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 99
> > PGP KeyID:157E98EE  
> FingerPrint:FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>