lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3EE891FF.2050600@snosoft.com>
From: dotslash at snosoft.com (KF)
Subject: Please Vote Today  -  subscribe to "full-disclosure@...unitysec.com"
 

Am I insane or do I remember a few months back a special moderated 
version of this list being created for the folks that could not handle 
PHC and their massive flooding / ranting on the list? If it was not 
provided by Len himself I do know Dave Aitel *had* one set up. If you 
can't "hang" subscribe to Daves version.

http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Full-Disclosure/2002-08/0438.html

I wish it was as easy to make a filter for all the folks flipping out as 
it would be be to make ONE rule for woods email address. =]

*hint* *hint*

-KF


Myers, Marvin wrote:

>This is pure Bull$hit. Don't agree with him, filter his e-mails. If the
>list  becomes censored, I urge all list members who have ever had the
>balls to have an original ideal to unsubscribe. What next. Who next. I
>believe that the majority of this list doesn't really mind the rantings
>of the wood. Hell that's the only way I have to entertain myself at this
>starch collar dungeon where I work. Kick off the wood and you can send
>me along with him. I can not believe that someone who would join an
>unmoderated list would have the gall to try to censor. Don't open your
>eyes, you are sure to see nothing but colon, because you surely have
>your head where the sun does not shine.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: morning_wood [mailto:se_cur_ity@...mail.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:38 PM
>To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com; 0day
>Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Please Vote Today
>
>
> some famous white hat's letter to Full Disclosure..
>
>-------------------- snippy -------------------------------------
>
>Len: It is my belief that list members who repeatedly post ridicule that
>could not possibly be of any use for on-topic readers -- particularly
>those
>who post such things without any other contributions -- should at least
>have their right to post permanently stripped, if they are allowed to
>remain subscribers at all.  It is also my belief that Donnie Werner's
>recent posts fit squarely into this catergory.  Not only has Donnie
>Werner
>continued to waste the effort of list maintainers and subscribers with
>non-contributory e-mail, but he has also been extremely un-professional
>in
>the few cases where he has provided anything worth anyone's time.  For
>this
>reason, sorting through Donnie Werner's junk mail is not worth my time,
>or
>the time wasted of anyone else on this list.  It is with the highest
>regard
>for Full-Disclosure as a place of promise in the continuing evolution of
>information security, that I must urge the removal of Donnie Werner, as
>it
>is in the best interest of all on the list, and the future of the list
>itself.
>
>---------------- end snippy ---------------------------------------
>
>Ladies and Gentleman... I am being systematicly blackballed,
>If I coment on one white hat, I get threats from two more..
>
>--------------- snippy --------------------------------------------
>
>"I've created a poll to address this "Morning Wood" issue.
>Quite a few people have been contacting us in regards to
>his behaviour on the list and needless to say no small
>number of people have left the list because of recent activity.
>
>http://www.netsys.com/cgi-bin/poll?pn=7
>
>We'll wait a week before taking any action.
>
>Note: We can moderate individuals who are problematic but we
>are loath to actually remove someone from the list because there
>is always hope for improvement. I am optimistic that if people
>can be made aware of their anti-social behaviour they often
>change for the better. We're all human and we've all got our
>faults!
>
>Len
>
>------------------- snippy ------------------------------
>
>more...
>
>----------------- snippy --------------------------------
>
>  
>
>>>We would like to ask everyone who feels the need to
>>>respond with one line comments to someone elses
>>>inflammtory message to try to restrain themselves
>>>because you are becoming part of the problem.
>>>      
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Len
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Exactly who is "we" ?
>>    
>>
>
>The people who own this list. You know, the ones paying money out of
>their pocket to host it.
>
>Say, why don't you fuck off before you get hurt. You're starting to
>irritate
>me with your continous bullshit postings. Onviously this is the first
>time you've subscribed to a mailing list and you're utterly intrigued
>with seeing your own messages get post.
>
>I say again why don't you fuck off before you get hurt!
>------------------------- snippy---------------------------
>
>well isnt that lovely...
>
>Donnie Werner
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>  
>



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ