full-disclosure - Morning Wood Poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B0ACE7ED6E245F48BED50961753949E3265386@grandsierra.sundownerinteriors.com>
From: cpeden at sundownerinteriors.com (Chris Peden)
Subject: Morning Wood Poll

I know how to use my delete key, although protected, I did not like the
fact morning_wood deliberately sent a post with a virus....that to me is
very unprpofessional and is against everything we here stand for.  Maybe
a previous post asking who would be interested in receiving such a post,
and then emailing those people privately.

Maybe setup the list to deny attachments would do it?

Thanks,
-Chris-
IT Director
Sundowner Interiors
 


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel M. Edwards [mailto:dme@...a.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:09 PM
>To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
>Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Morning Wood Poll
>
>
>The morning wood posts themselves are not what annoy me.  It 
>is the barrage
>of posts that follow that do.  Both sides of this argument are 
>guilty.  The
>anti-wood party posts how Morning Wood is a moron after he 
>posts then the
>pro-wood party responses by calling that person a moron.  It just keeps
>going until I have 40 e-mails that can be summed by "Am Not" 
>and "Are Too".
>
>
>I like the idea for two full-disclosure lists one for 
>disclosures and one
>for discussions.
>
>Daniel M. Edwards
>Network Specialist
>A. Duda & Sons, Inc.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
>[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
>David Sentelle
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:27 AM
>To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
>
>
>I've already cast my vote, but I think a simple yes/no is not 
>sufficient for
>the real solution.
>
>The real solution is to have a fully open full-disclosure 
>mailing list, only
>for full-disclosure.  People not disclosing vulnerabilities or 
>bugs would be
>warned then banned on repeat offenses.  
>
>To resolve the issue of ongoing correspondence regarding 
>disclosures made on
>the full-disclosure list, there would be a 
>full-disclosure-DISCUSSION list.
>That would be the 'noise' list, that would contain 99% of what 
>is currently
>in full-disclosure.
>
>This post should go to the discussion list.  Many of Morning 
>Wood's posts
>would hopefully go to the discussion list, with the 
>disclosures he's made
>going to the full-disclosure list.
>
>Would the addition of a discussion list, and the policy change for the
>full-disclosure list, really cramp anyone's freedom of speech 
>or the value
>of the full-disclosure list?
>
>
>
>This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
>intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
>are addressed.  If you have received this e-mail in error, you are 
>prohibited from using, divulging any of its contents, or forwarding 
>this email.  Please notify admin@...cbank.com and delete it from 
>your system.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>