full-disclosure - Destroying PCs remotely?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: rthompson at rrmm.net (Rick Thompson)
Subject: Destroying PCs remotely?

Recently, they very much wanted to make it NOT temporary as well, but cooler
heads prevailed.  Unfortunately, history shows that they will reintroduce
the measure as many times as necessary to get it passed as part of some
unrelated legislation.  We'll see how much you support it when they tag you
as a terrorist with no proof.

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of Shawn
McMahon
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:14 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Destroying PCs remotely?

<snip>

Well, as both of my sentences clearly state, the restriction of
liberties is temporary.  The enhancment of security is permanent in that
if the terrorists are captured and/or killed, they no longer pose a
threat.

</snip>