full-disclosure - Linux firewall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0306181943390.24585-100000@server.dimick.net>
From: denis at dimick.net (Denis Dimick)
Subject: Linux firewall

Dont know about BSD.. But I would use Linux.. This is what I use everyday 
for the past 5 years.. Have yet to have anyone get thru.. Even the morons 
at EEye have tried..

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Gabe Arnold wrote:

> I would suggest you use an OpenBSD 3.3 setup with the native PF 
> (Packet Filter)package which is based on the 'BSD IPF package.  
> It's quite nice, easy to use, and very secure.  I'd check out 
> www.openbsd.org and www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ for a good overview of the 
> PF package and how to use it.
> 
> --Gabe
> 
> 
> * Spencer, Gary  TRI-S INC (spencerg@....army.mil) wrote:
> >  
> >  
> > Hello everyone. I have been following the discussions for a few months now
> > and enjoy the technical information that everyone has to share. What would
> > your recommendations be for a Linux firewall? And would you use a 50,000
> > Cisco firewall instead?? 
> >  
> > Thanks,
> >  
> > Gary.
> >  
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>