| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200306271805.h5RI58jK010592@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:23:47 +1300, Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk> said: > I'm fully in favour of "quoted-line to new content" ratio moderation. > Simply bounce any message with more quoted lines than non-quoted, or > whatever more or less harsh ratio you think is reasonable. Messages > without "substantial" new content relative to quoted content are > generally (like 95-99%) not worth the bandwidth, storage space or > deletion time they "consume". You do, of course, realize that sometimes a one-line "read THIS url" suffices? That's when you start seeing slash-dot style padding that's there just to make more new lines than original. Now I've got a 50/50 ratio. Barely. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030627/2d0ee983/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists