[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Law11-OE68rMbzjqruz000044da@hotmail.com>
From: se_cur_ity at hotmail.com (morning_wood)
Subject: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER
>Last year, when Guninski discovered a security hole inside
Microsoft's
>Office XP, he informed the company about his discovery, waited 14
days,
>then published instructions on how it could be exploited.
>
>Not enough time
>
>Microsoft said that wasn't enough time to issue a patch. And,
frustrated
>with the entire full-disclosure principle, it began using such
situations
>to bolster arguments that the entire bug-reporting system needs an
overhaul
i think an email acknowledging the person would proaly keep most from
publishing, generally
that is where the frustration lies, not in a fast patch, but a simple
"thank you" or "could you help us"
"thank you, we will see to it we mention you for bringing this to our
attention" ... its not like we want $1,000,000.
some of us compete in an employment market wrought with book educated
admins making 6 figure incomes, and
we are digging out thier mistakes. Just because someone don't look
good on resume doesnt mean they should not be
highly sought after. I personaly would be proud to have Mr Gudinski ,
or Mitnick and of the others
on my payroll anyday
Donnie Werner
http://nothackers.org/about.php
Powered by blists - more mailing lists