[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F1954C5.8040606@guninski.com>
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER
mattmurphy@...rr.com wrote:
> You may remember that Guninski completely failed to notify the VIM
> development team of security vulnerabilities in its product, and these were
> brought up by a third party on VIM-DEV for the first time. I would have
> understood CC'ing the major security lists with the post *in addition to*
> vim-dev, as it *is* a public channel.
>
hey kiddie,
you'd better check your facts before spreading misinformation.
vim developers and vendor-sec list were notified as it is written in my
advisory. it was a long thread with all of them. the advisory quotes solar
designer that his distribution is not vulnerable. in addition, later i disclosed
to them 2 more bugs in vim.
i don't mean that it is necessary to notify the vendors at all, but in this case
there are a lot of witnesses that i notified vim.
just returning from vacation, shall reply to the others lamers later.
georgi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists