full-disclosure - OT but related.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030729143829.3d40868e.list@hardlined.com>
From: list at hardlined.com (Shanphen Dawa)
Subject: OT but related.

I don't subscribe to bugtraq for the reasons you listed, vendor annoucing, and a lot of material that just isn't interesting to me. Usually there are a couple people subscribed to both, so if there is anything important posted to bugtraq, it usually gets reposted here.


On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 03:34:14 +1000 (Australia/ACT)
Darren Reed <avalon@...igula.anu.edu.au> wrote:

> 
> I'm curious to know, does anyone subscribe to full-disclosure BUT NOT
> bugtraq ?  Is there any material that currently appears on bugtraq that
> never appears on full-disclosure ?  Is there anything that owners of
> full-disclsoure could do to bridge that gap, if it exists ?
> 
> My personal current evaluation of the two lists is tending towards bugtraq
> being irrelevant, these days as it becomes more of a vendor-announce list
> (especially for Linux) than a useful forum to particpate in.
> 
> Cheers,
> Darren
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 


-- 
/*
"To avoid all evil, to cultivate good, 
and to cleanse one's mind  
this is the teaching of the Buddhas."

Martin Ekendahl
http://www.hardlined.com
martin@...dlined.com
*/