lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: jonathan at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman) Subject: OT but related. On Tuesday 29 July 2003 13:34, Darren Reed wrote: > I'm curious to know, does anyone subscribe to full-disclosure BUT NOT > bugtraq ? Is there any material that currently appears on bugtraq that > never appears on full-disclosure ? Is there anything that owners of > full-disclsoure could do to bridge that gap, if it exists ? I think the fact that someone on FD will still subscribe to BT and pass along anything that misses this list takes care of bridging that gap. <tongue in cheek> unless Symantec decides to claim copyrights on all bugtraq submissions </tongue in cheek> > My personal current evaluation of the two lists is tending towards > bugtraq being irrelevant, these days as it becomes more of a > vendor-announce list (especially for Linux) than a useful forum to > particpate in. Agree. I tend to prefer the "Wild West" environment that FD offers. You get relevant information and good wholesome entertainment to boot. I subscribe to both, and will probably continue to do so. But, if I had to drop one...Bugtraq would be gone. -- Jonathan Rickman X Corps Security http://www.xcorps.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists