full-disclosure - OT but related.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200307291701.31989.jonathan@xcorps.net>
From: jonathan at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman)
Subject: OT but related.

On Tuesday 29 July 2003 13:34, Darren Reed wrote:
> I'm curious to know, does anyone subscribe to full-disclosure BUT NOT
> bugtraq ?  Is there any material that currently appears on bugtraq that
> never appears on full-disclosure ?  Is there anything that owners of
> full-disclsoure could do to bridge that gap, if it exists ?

I think the fact that someone on FD will still subscribe to BT and pass
along anything that misses this list takes care of bridging that gap.

<tongue in cheek>
unless Symantec decides to claim copyrights on all bugtraq submissions
</tongue in cheek>

> My personal current evaluation of the two lists is tending towards
> bugtraq being irrelevant, these days as it becomes more of a
> vendor-announce list (especially for Linux) than a useful forum to
> particpate in.

Agree. I tend to prefer the "Wild West" environment that FD offers. You get
relevant information and good wholesome entertainment to boot. I subscribe
to both, and will probably continue to do so. But, if I had to drop
one...Bugtraq would be gone.

--
Jonathan Rickman
X Corps Security
http://www.xcorps.net