full-disclosure - [secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com: Re: Samba version numbers]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030729165136.GW11606@netsys.com>
From: len at netsys.com (Len Rose)
Subject: [secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com: Re: Samba version numbers]

----- Forwarded message from Sun Security Coordination Team <secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com> -----

From: Sun Security Coordination Team <secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com>
Message-Id: <200307291649.h6TGnmh19367@...urity.sfbay.sun.com>
Subject: Re: Samba version numbers
To: len@...sys.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: security-alert@....com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Len,

> Hi.. as far as I know there is a mistake in:
> 
> Security Vulnerability in Samba(7) Versions 2.2.2 Through 2.2.8 May Allow
> Remote User Unauthorized Privileges
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert%2F53581&zone_32=category%3Asecurity
> 
> It should be 2.2.2 through 2.2.7a
> 

Thanks for notifying us about this. You are correct. We will make the
changes though it will probably take a few days to filter through the
system.

Best regards,
Sun Security Coordination Team
security-alert@....com

----- End forwarded message -----