full-disclosure - [secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com: Re: Samba version numbers]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: len at netsys.com (Len Rose)
Subject: [secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com: Re: Samba version numbers]

Actually Sun was right and I was wrong, they later contacted me
and pointed out the issues were valid for Samba prior to 2.2.8a.


Len


> ----- Forwarded message from Sun Security Coordination Team <secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com> -----
> From: Sun Security Coordination Team <secure@...urity.sfbay.sun.com>
> Message-Id: <200307291649.h6TGnmh19367@...urity.sfbay.sun.com>
> Subject: Re: Samba version numbers
> To: len@...sys.com
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
> Reply-To: security-alert@....com
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Hello Len,
> 
> > Hi.. as far as I know there is a mistake in:
> > 
> > Security Vulnerability in Samba(7) Versions 2.2.2 Through 2.2.8 May Allow
> > Remote User Unauthorized Privileges
> > http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert%2F53581&zone_32=category%3Asecurity
> > 
> > It should be 2.2.2 through 2.2.7a
> > 
> 
> Thanks for notifying us about this. You are correct. We will make the
> changes though it will probably take a few days to filter through the
> system.
> 
> Best regards,
> Sun Security Coordination Team
> security-alert@....com
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----