lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200308051730.26467.devnull@iprimus.com.au>
From: devnull at iprimus.com.au (devnull@...imus.com.au)
Subject: RPC DCOM Patches

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 05:11 am, Byron Copeland wrote:
> Has anyone proved that NT 4.0 is vulnerable?  I keep seeing references
> everywhere that it is... who has the proof?

The advisories from Microsoft etc mention NT as being vulnerable.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ