[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF9ACE88CE.4343708D-ON80256D80.0046FAB8-80256D80.0047E076@lexicon.co.uk>
From: Mike.Keighley at lexicon.co.uk (Mike.Keighley@...icon.co.uk)
Subject: MSblast worm
Ah, yes. The vulnerability does indeed exist in NT.
But with respect, what Jasper asks is whether the *MSblast worm* affects
NT ?
The exploit code and discussions on here seem to suggest it targets only
2000 and XP.
Does *this exploit* target NT successfully ? Not that I have seen /
heard.
Could an exploit be written which exploits NT ? Oh yes.
--
Mike
Simon Glassman <simon@...box.co.uk> wrote:
> This is affecting the following machines.
> Windows NT 4.0 server
> Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition
> Windows 2000
> Windows XP 32 Bit Edition
> Windows XP 64 Bit Edition
> Windows Server 2003 32 Bit Edition
> Windows Server 2003 64 Bit Edition
> More info <snip> security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp
>> On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:53 am, Jasper Blackwell wrote:
>> Does anyone know if this MSblast worm affects Win NT machines,
>> or is it just infecting 2000 and XP.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists