lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3F3D3E40.10003@guninski.com> From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski) Subject: Re: Microsoft MCWNDX.OCX ActiveX buffer overflow So you are collecting 0days for free, put them in a lame database and whine more than a script kiddie this is a hard job? Steven M. Christey wrote: > By the way, this is one of the many things that makes vulnerability > databases expensive to maintain (assuming that correctness is a > desirable feature of such databases). >