full-disclosure - curious email

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3F3CEB62.3080501@loafman.com>
From: kenneth at loafman.com (Kenneth Loafman)
Subject: curious email

Hmmm, spammer must be a better lawyer than you thought.  When I go to
the page I get:

     [ this page has been removed ]

and that's it.

...Ken


Anders Bjarby wrote:
  > Very common scam, google for "nigeria letter" and you'll notice that
  > you are not alone. :)
  >
  > /Anders
  >
  > fredagen den 15 augusti 2003 kl 13.11 skrev Tom Koehler:
  >
  >> I see quite a lot of stuff like that coming at
  >> our mail system. I believe its called the nigera
  >> connection. The various storys have gained cult status
  >> in germany (http://www.nigeria-connection.de sorry page in
  >> german). The last one I remember is from last week supposedly
  >> coming from swizterland trying to get at some money sombody
  >> owned how died in the Lockerby crash (quite tastless that).
  >> Those are all schemes to get at your money
  >> hth
  >> tom
  >>
  >>> I received a rather strange email today [08.15.03] at 12:44AM. I'll
  >>> let the email speak for itself:
  >>> http://www.osidan.com/tmp/curiosemail.html
  >>
  >>
  >>> If anyone has any information regarding a scandal revolving around an
  >>> email of this sort, please let me know. I believe I read an article or
  >>> perhaps it was a past FD thread that discussed some sort of scandal
  >>> resembling this scenario. I've not responded to this fellow, nor do I
  >>> intend to, as the email surely seems to be a fake. Firstly, this
  >>> person managed to track my email down but did not address me formally?
  >>> He is a lawyer, so he says, and as such, he certainly should have used
  >>> my name. Also, the email header seems somewhat strange. It's addressed
  >>> to himself from himself. The only place the email address to which he
  >>> was directing the email [my email address] was found was in the
  >>> top-most Received information clause, where I have exchanged that
  >>> particular email address with "my@...il.address". Any information
  >>> would be much appreciated.
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> --  COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test
  >> --------------------------------------------------
  >> 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger!
  >> 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit?tssieger!
  >> 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8.
  >> e-Post
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
  >> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
  >>
  > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  > -----
  >
  > Anders Bjarby
  > Infomaker Scandinavia AB
  > http://www.infomaker.se
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
  > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
  >