full-disclosure - Fwd: Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200308190124.h7J1O7Vq002220@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Fwd: Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source 

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:12:42 -0300, Stephen Clowater <steve@...vesworld.hopto.org>  said:

> Personally,I think FD should bounce back any message with a binary
>  attachement to the poster. This is not a 0day exploit list, if you cant
>  compile it yourself, you shouldnt have the binary :)

OK.  Who on the list will 'fess up to having an *original* source to MS-Blaster?

:)

(OK, so a pointer to a website is more desirable, but sometimes it just doesn't
work as well - if it's a "We're being attacked by *this*" posting, there's no
guarantee you're still on the air when people read it.  And there's the problem
of knowing when to remove it from the website - some people might be on
vacation and not see the note till 3 weeks from now...)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030818/7ac7ae5f/attachment.bin